Charles county tax sale procedure

Assembl?nationale ~ Report of r?ion of?nomy g?rale, the committee of supply and the plan Assembl?nationale ~ Report of r?ion Committee of supply, the?nomy g?rale and plan. does –..Audition of Mme.Christine Lagarde, minister of ḻ.?onomy, finances and l’.emploi, and M..?ic Woerth, minister for the Budget, the public accounts and the public office, on the bill of finances for 2008 2 Pr?dent Didier Migaud, to apr?avoir souhait?a welcome?me and?..les ministers for pr?nter the PLF for 2008 adopt?e morning in the Council of Ministers, inform the Commission qu’.il has demand? M. The relative document?a r?rtition by let us r?ons requests will be communiqu?ux Members of the Commission. ?aborer a PLF n’.est never easy especially, like c’.est the case this ann? when donn? macro-?nomiques several variations underwent. The public accounts include/understand the budget of l’.?at and that of the s?rit?ociale.. it must?demment hold account of l’.ensemble world context and, in l’.occurrence, of l’.impact of the crisis financi?. A d?t will have d’.ailleurs place?e matter next Tuesday. It is thus particuli?ment int?ssant of conna?e the mani? whose ministers appr?ent the situation. This project is, as?ui?a time responsible, voluntary and innovating. When the public d?nses repr?ntent more moiti?e the national richness, its efficacit?st crucial for l’.ensemble of ḻ.?nomy. If the growth is lib?e, l’.?ilibre finance public will be able?e restaur?vant the end of the five-year period and, can -?e, d?2010. Premi? mark of factory of this PLF.: to invest massively in the fall of the pr?vements. These pr?vements has vocation?inancer well the public d?nses. C’.est thus on a whole of 335.milliards in 2007 that this r?e will s’.appliquera. With a hypoth? ḏ.inflation?, 6.%, it will be in addition possible of d?ger only 5,5.milliards of d?nses suppl?ntaires. Does the growth of the budget, on this p?m?e, have? from 1,1.% in volume and on average between 1999 and 2006 and of 0,2.% in 2007. This budget ensures?lement the financing of falls d’.imp? d?d?nt?eurement, of which that of the professional tax. Does the PLF have?demment? ?bor?n coh?nce with the PLFSS. D?cette ann? the d?cit of the public administrations will be ramen? 2,4.points of GDP instead of 2,5.affich?en LFI. This effort makes it possible to bring back the weight of the public d?nse in the GDP of 53,4.% in 2006?2,6.% in 2008. The obligatory pr?vements will be all?s, passing from 44,2.% of the GDP in 2006?3,7.% of the nearest GDP l’.an. Deuxi? mark of factory: financing true priorit? It is necessary all d’.abord to take into account the d?nses pass? the pensions increased by 2.milliards and charges it of the int?ts of the debt of 1,6.milliard. Their equipment progresses in the PLF of 1,2.milliard by report/ratio?007. These three stations saturate almost?ux only the progression with 5,5.milliards autoris?pour the d?nse. The priorit?sont l’.enseignement sup?or and the research, which b?ficient of 1,8.milliard suppl?ntaires means. If l’.on adds the d?nses d’.investissement, the d?nses which pr?rent to l’.avenir, out the military d?nses, increase by 6.% by s’.?vant?9.milliards. All the minist?s are engag?dans a d?rche of r?rmes structural and research of the performance. Won't these r?ctions d’.emploi in addition be d?urn? by cr?ions in public?blissements. Within the d?nses d’.intervention, efforts of rationalization are op?s, in particular?ravers a progressive r?ction raisonn?et of the number of aid employment? N the other hand, they will be more associ? with the d?sions of l’.?at which can have a financial impact on their accounts. Troisi? mark of factory: clear choices and coh?nts in mati? of fiscalit?Quatri? mark of factory: this PLF s’.accompagne of news m?odes d’.action and r?rme to the service of the clart?t of l’.efficacit?La pr?ntation of the budget is clearer –..documents submitted to the Parliament, lesson tir?des first annual reports of performance, indicators better document?etc. It proc?, moreover?ne clarification in?te of the relations between l’.?at and the s?rit?ociale. It is essential to revisit each d?nse F? syst?tic?a lumi? of will sound efficacit?t the Parliament have a R? ?nent?ouer in this news d?rche. This PLF is the first stake on the way of l’.assainissement durable and n?ssaire of the finance public. It is fond?ur a double d?rche.: lucidit?t optimism. Most beautiful?ipe of France, it is 63.millions them of Fran?s.. this?rd the first tool installed is the modification of the r?me appreciations concerning the contributions of patents. Lastly, the cr?t imp?recherche will r?ndra d?rmais with the imp?tifs of simplification and d’.extension. The contributions of these modifications will be 800.millions in 2009 and of 1,3.milliard in r?me of croisi?. Second?ment.?onsid?r: ḻ.augmentation of the capacity d’.achat. Another measurement: the revalorization of the thresholds and the limits of the EPP of 1,3.%. Troisi? ?ment.: to try to arrive, in best the d?is, with the full employment. The measurement of law TEPA over the hours suppl?ntaires will come into effect?ompter of the 1. The pr?sionnel of growth retained for the calculation of the PLF is included in a range of 2.%?, 5.%, that is to say, the m? that that retained in November 2006. For calculations, the point m?an of 2,25.% A? retained. Consumption, in June, July and ao? has d’.ailleurs? tr??v? m? that the industrial production and cr?ions them d’.emplois. The Rapporteur g?ral thanks the ministers for this fast and dense pr?ntation. This PLF is tr?coh?nt puisqu’.il s’.inscrit in a strat?e revival of the growth and comp?tivit?mais?lement of r?blissement public accounts. The r?ltats are with return you: the d?cit?it of 50.milliards in 2002.. in 2006, it?it of 36.milliards. Moreover, of the priorit?claires have? affirm?.: justice, research, teaching sup?or. The level of r?rve will be thus pr?rv?la the embl?tique measurement?nt the deep r?rme of the cr?t imp?recherche. The pr?sion of receipts having? careful, the surplus of receipts is it always?lu?ntre 2 and 5.milliards.. A d?et d’.avance?nt in pr?ration, which cr?ts?e abond?et which red?oiements is envisag will owe?. For the premi? time, it will undoubtedly be n?ssaire of compl?r the cr?ts to the title of the int?ts of the debt, but?uelle height. The projection of receipts of 2008 retains it as bases the pr?sion of 2007 or one pr?sion r?s?et if so?uelle height. Which are the hypoth?s in term of rate d’.?sticit?ar report/ratio?a growth. Which will be l’.impact TEPA, re-examined?a drops compared to July. ?ant heard that the p?m?e is?rgi –..de 270?30.milliards.–., which instruments of r?lation and setting in r?rve of cr?ts will be put in œ.uvre.. Pr?dent Didier Migaud recalls that the economic services have more pessimistic hypoth?s of growth. N?moins, the Government taking again l’.hypoth? retained by the government pr?dent for 2007, doesn't it underestimate, for 2008, the..choc of confidence. of which it has? question last July. The LOLF forces to d?nir in LFI the cr?ts put in r?rve. The Government will take again it the m?s r?es that l’.an last. How to apply them within the framework of the contribution europ?ne or the equipments of the collectivit?locales.. Lastly, the Government s’.est engag? to submit a report on the levelling off of the tax niches and a minimal contribution, but which are really its intentions. R?nses will they be indeed apport?... the minister consid? what l’.essentiel rests indeed in l’.ex?tion of the budget and which the Government will show in the mati? tr?vigilant. L’.ex?tion of 2007 will undoubtedly be better than the pr?sion, in particular on the receipts, the maintained fork of 2?.milliards?nt. Would the appreciations on l’.imp?sur the soci?s owe?e important, of m? that receipts resulting from the rough VAT. Next a d?et d’.avance will comprise Co? r?ltant passage of the Dean cyclone as well as the measurements taken in favour of l’.emploi. Does S’.agissant of l’.?rgissement of the p?m?e, it import Cr?demment? instruments of r?lation. The r?rve of pr?ution, as?lle, will s’.appliquera with the budget g?ral and will be on title II of 0,5.% and 6.% on l’.ensemble of the others d?nses. Mrs. the minister pr?se that the figuring of the TEPA does have? ?bor?ur the base of stock known d’.heures suppl?ntaires in 2006. In r?me of croisi?, the total will be of 14,687.milliards. For l’.exercice 2007, the percentage of growth retained ranged between 2.% and 2,5.%. Taking into account the figures of the first and deuxi? quarters of 2007, m? what of the pr?sions concerning the troisi? and quatri? quarters, it will be located plut?en low fork. Since, this n’.est not so much is a..choc of confidence. which intervened but a financial shock having affect?es march?boursiers, especially am?cains. Without over-estimating its r?rcussions, the range of 2.%?, 5.% seems justifi?.le minister adds?ropos minimal contribution of professional tax, qu’.un report/ratio owes?e returned the 15.octobre. It thus cannot in?e question in the PLF pr?nt?ujourd' today. S’.agissant of the load of the debt?qu?par the rapporteur g?ral, the budget for 2007 pr?yait 200.millions d’.euros moreover qu’.en 2006, which carried the total?nviron 39.milliards d’.euros. L’.hypoth? d’.un l?r d?ssement cannot?e?rt? but it ṉ.exist nothing d’.inqui?nt?e day. How has one led to the figure of 716.millions in ann?pleine.. Does there exist, on this basis, of projections on the ann? following. With 44.% of is the GDP in 2007, France the quatri? country of l’.Union europ?ne in terms of obligatory rates of pr?vements. It is thus necessary to be r?uir l’.abaissement of this rate in the PLF for 2008. If l’.on adds l’.investissement in mati? of d?nse and the figures of the PLF, one reaches approximately 23,5.milliards d’.euros. It is however more than probable that, if l’.on carried out a research mission by mission, the total would be much more?v?La d?rmination of this amount would contribute largely?a clart?e the pr?ntation of the budget..J?me Cahuzac in the name of the group socialist, radical, citizen and various left, underlines?’.instar of Pr?dent Didier Migaud, the paradoxes of the PLF for 2008. L’.estimation of growth of 2?, 5.% rests on the analyses ḏ.organisms ext?eurs. However these m?s organizations d?ntent the pr?sions of the Government for 2007. How it possible of s’.appuyer is on their pr?sions for l’.ann?prochaine without retaining those qu’.ils formulate for this ann?. Deuxi? paradox: Government esp? a growth tr?forte in the last quarter of 2007, of l’.ordre of 1,1?, 3.%, so d’.atteindre in ann?pleine the level annonc?Une such quarterly growth corresponds?ne growth of 5.% in annual rate/rhythm. However the Government pr?it qu’.un rate of 2?, 5.% for l’.ann?suivante. It is necessary of s’.?nner that the..choc of confidence. is not translated, at least, by a shock of growth. Do the official documents communiqu?par the Government indicate for their part that this stock will be 64,2.%? end of 2007. Why, d?lors, to produce these figures with so many solennit?.?ic Woerth?lement has indiqu?ue the possibilit?de d?nses suppl?ntaires s’.?vaient?, 5.milliards d’.euros. This amount s’.imputer can on the d?nses suppl?ntaires.. The Government announces refunding?autor of 5.milliards d’.euros, the debts of l’.?at towards the s?rit?ociale. However the Court of accounts estimates that this debt s’.?vait at the end of 2006?, 1.milliards. Consid? it qu’.il s’.agit l?’.un refunding for balance of any account and that the s?rit?ociale will not be able to count on the remaining 4,1.milliards d’.euros. In addition, a reduction of 20.% of the compensation of the professional tax has? annonc??ivers organizations repr?ntant the collectivit?locales. The Government confirms it this figure, which would result in a fall consid?ble p?quation, and thus of l’.?it?entre the territories. One waits 800.millions d’.euros d’.emplois suppressions in the public office in 2008. Increases in r?n?tion annonc? is imput? on this sum d?l’.ann?prochaine, or the m?nism it will not be put in œ.uvre qu’.ult?eurement... Pascal Terrasse, relates to l’.exon?tion whose the m?co-social?blissements in zone of rural revitalization b?ficient today. It has? question of calling into question these advantages. The Government can it bring pr?sions on this subject. More the Government known as to advance quickly, more it makes balance. titrates d’.exemple, it announces a great effort in mati? d’.enseignement sup?or and of research but pr?it no cr?ion of station. It would be int?ssant of conna?e its projects of privatization, sale of participations in the national soci?s, or of sale of the public inheritance. One would love d’.ailleurs conna?e the pr?s amount receipts resulting from the sale of this inheritance. One would?lement wish pr?sions on l’.?t of l’... autor?ction.. of l’.imp? ?qu?par the Minister for the Budget about the b?ficiaires of the tax shield. The Government n’.a not? to tr?clair?e prone at the time of the d?t on the bill TEPA. Which are its projects for r?anger still the professional tax. Will limit?ux be taxpaying impos?dans the highest section of l’.IR and with taxable people?’.ISF... Charles de Courson, in the name of the group Nouveau Centers, stresses that the d?cit budget of l’.?at Pr? for 2008 still?e can qualifi?’.excessif. With 41,7.milliards d’.euros, he is a sup?or with the d?cit d’.ex?tion for 2007, which is estim? 38,3.milliards, and almost?l with the figure of the PLF 2007, which?it of 42,2.milliards. Majorit?r?dentielle the s’.?nt engag??upprimer the fine d?cit?a of mandature, it will be necessary, during the four ann? remaining, r?iser 10.milliards d’.euros of r?ction per annum. That repr?nte of the efforts consid?bles. Does an effort certainly have? fact in the pr?ntation of the budget of l’.?at, since l’.on y r?t?e of the pr?vements on receipts: collectivit?locales and Union europ?ne. Is Qu’.en proposals compl?ntaires formul? by the New Center to still?rgir the d?rche.. Such an extension makes pass the total of 360,9.milliards?69,3.milliards, that is to say a diff?nce of 2,3.%. L’.id??it?lement of pr?nter d?nses tax news corresponding?es cr?ts d’.imp?. L’.objectif of r?anger then to remove the d?cit in the five years which come s’.en finds?ign?’.autant. Could D’.apr?les figures of the Government, this proportion remain inchang?en 2007, knowing that l’.?t march? conduit?enoncer?ertaines transfers d’.actifs. L’.estimation for 2008 is 64.%, which repr?nte a tr?faible fall, of l’.ordre of 3.milliards d’.euros. One cannot thus reproach the Government for making too much d’.?nomies.: on the contrary qu’.il is needed goes with-del?t the additions to the 4.?.milliards pr?s 3?.milliards suppl?ntaires d’.?nomies. It will accept initiatives of the committee of supply going in this direction. In the hard one? indeed, the situation n’.est not tenable..J?me Chartier that the?nomies Li? ?a r?ction of manpower of civils servant would owe s’.?ver?nviron 720.millions d’.euros in ann?pleine. The r?ction of 22.900.postes pr?e for 2008 does not correspond qu’.?50.millions.: this n’.est qu’.en 2009 that l’.on will be in ann?pleine. L’.objectif of the not-replacement d’.un civil servant leaving in retirement on two more than is ever maintained. It would allow 900.millions?n billion d’.euros d’.?nomies. It will?lement be advisable to discuss l’.instrument measurement allowing of s’.accorder on the figures: it s’.agit l?’.un pr?able important..J?me Chartier l’.a relev?les obligatory rates of pr?vements will decrease in 2008, as they have D? diminu?n 2007. This fall?it with the cœ.ur of the countryside of Pr?dent of R?blique. F? to perceive l’.imp?est in addition tr?importante. The fight counters the fraud rev??lement a great importance. They are thus 54.milliards d’.euros which goes towards l’.investissement and towards l’.avenir. Such a vision is desirable, because it n’.oppose not d?nse d’.investissement and d?nse of operation. S’.agissant of the tax effects of fusion between Gas of France and Suez?qu?par M..J?me Cahuzac, the minist? can't Budget pr?ger of the rentr? of l’.imp?sur soci?s. It is necessary on the other hand to greet the succ?de this op?tion. The reduction in the equipment of compensation of the professional tax is indeed sensitive. If the equipment of compensation?it only the touch? it would be abaiss?de 46.%. One thus chose a fall of 20.%, d’.autres put equipments?nt?ontribution. Will the Government be n?moins open?oute proposal of the Parliament on the subject?ondition that the 1,6.% are respect? As for the 5,1.milliards d’.euros of debts of l’.?at towards the s?rit?ociale, they have? constat?au 31.d?mbre 2006..J?me Cahuzac undoubtedly includes/understands?ments relating to the FFIPSA or?’.autres organizations. The refunding of 5,1.milliards, which n’.a not? contest?ar commission of contr? accounts of the s?rit?ociale, will be r?is?u month d’.octobre. The Government n’.a not l’.intention to see a debt of this kind constituting?ouveau. Lastly, measurements relating to the exon?tions of the m?co-social?blissements in the zones of rural revitalization rel?nt of the PLFSS. The cons?tive d?nse?a law TEPA is a d?nse d’.investissement. Measurements are not yet in strength: c’.est in 2008 and 2009 qu’.elles will make feel their effects. But it was necessary to give oneself these means not to build on sand. C’.est by the means of this investment that l’.?at will be in measurement of ma?iser its d?nses and its d?cits. On the whole, this budget proc? not d’.une approach..aust?... Plut?que of rigour, one will speak d’.une approach all?a time rigorous, ambitious, courageuse…..Charles de.Courson has for its part put l’.accent on the d?cit, but truth d?cit is the d?cit of work. Such is ḻ.id?ma?ess of this budget: one does not produce sufficient wealth of France. C’.est the d?cit of work which leads to the financial d?cit. The ma?ise of the d?nse is of course tr?importante, but this n’.est not the only tool. If l’.on cannot be satisfied current situation, it is necessary to take into account the framework g?ral in which it s’.inscrit. Remainder, the?nomies r?is? owe?e structuring: c’.est this principle which underlies the r?sion g?rale public policies undertaken by the Government. The comit?e modernization pr?d?ar Pr?dent of R?blique will return its first arbitrations soon. It will r?ltera of it annual or multiannual plans aiming??iser these objectives basic, and a deuxi? arbitration will intervene in spring. Attention?lement with the against-cyclic d?nses which do not s’.appuient on structural r?rmes. Mme.le minister pr?se that his letter of mission pr?it well a r?exion on the obligatory pr?vements. This one will thus be put in œ.uvre. this subject, one will rel?ra that France is pass?du 35 rang in the world classification of l’.attractivit?qui measurement in particular l’.attractivit?iscale. Does work ḏ.?luation of the social VAT effectu?ar Bercy have? subjected by the Prime Minister?’.examen of the Council?nomic and social. The r?exion on this pr?vement and d’.autres pr?vements of m? type thus goes s’.int?er in the r?exion g?rale on the fiscalit?Il is?oter that the fall of the obligatory pr?vements is well r?le, passing from 44,2?4 then?3,7.% of PIB..J?me Cahuzac has d?nc?e paradox which would consist to?etenir the pr?sions of certain organizations for 2008 and?es to be unaware of for 2007. However m? the best experts cannot d?rminer the figure?, 1.% Pr? One can s’.?nner qu’.une?nomy knowing only 0,3.% of growth cr?plus of fifty thousand employment. This donn? ?aquelle one will add the figures of consumption and of the industrial production?enser leaves that the growth will be much better with the troisi? and quatri? quarters. Esp?r can thus that the growth will be?lement better in the premi? moiti?e 2008. As regards the national debt, calculation qu’.on makes of it?a fine of such or such quarter n’.est not completely relevant. Indeed, some disponibilit?r?is? with the wire of l’.ann?dans the agencies s’.accumulent, and l’.on s’.efforce to audit them most rationally possible..J?me Cahuzac objects that the leaders have confirm?e figure before the commission the week derni?. Mme.le minister estimates that those pr?gent can -?e a little too much of the process. S’.agissant of privatizations?qu? by M..Jean-Pierre Brard, the accounts and the report/ratio of l’.Agence of the participations of l’.?at will be submitted and comment?tr?prochainement. In g?ral, a margin ranging between 5 and 10.milliards d’.euros are pr?e with regard to the?ntuelles transfers of participations. C’.est within the framework of this envelope?aract? contractual what l’.on proc? with the transfers, according to l’.?t of the march?t according to the management of the inheritance of l’.?at. In 2007, only one transfer of participations intervened, that which related to France T?com. It allowed d’.encaisser 2,7.milliards d’.euros, it is -?anger less than what l’.enveloppe pr?e..le minister pr?se allowed that the sales d’.actifs affect the volume of the debt, and thus on the load which in r?lte in the budget. But it s’.agit not d’.une receipt budg?anger with the direction strict..Herv?ariton rel? with satisfaction the remarks tr?positifs of the ministers on the obligatory rate of pr?vements. This difficult?envoie?a question, soulev?par the rapporteur g?ral, of the base taken into account. In 2007, receipts suppl?ntaires are awaited as into 2006.: how to take into account this ph?m? to?blir the base of calculations for 2008.. This kind of under-?luation receipts can indeed succeed?n d?page of the obligatory rates of pr?vements. S’.agissant of the EPP, qu’.en are prospects for r?rme device. At the time of the pr?ntation of the PLF for 2007, the Minister for the Budget had indiqu?n objective d?nse of 0.% in value. Did this objective s’.est then somewhat estomp?mais it has again? invoqu?our 2008. Which are the prospects that l’.on can trace with-del?e the 2008.. With the p?m?e?rgi d?ni by the minister, is it possible to preserve l’.ambition of the..z? value.... With regard to the p?m?e, the rapporteur g?ral had dress?es tables in his last report/ratio of l’.an. The charter of budg?sation?lement contains?ments which are not always taken into account in the pr?ntation of the budget. The Parliament has thus the right to request indications pr?ses from the Government on l’.?lution of the p?m?e of budg?sation. A table engaging the Government on l’.?lution of the p?m?e is n?ssaire. Lastly, it has? pr?s?ue all produces it transfers would be consacr?u d?ndettement. That means it which l’.on made the political choice not devote no share of this product?es op?tions in capital that l’.?at could d?der carry out or?es equipments. In the ann? who come is profiled the probl? financing of l’.AFIT, by exemple..Fr?ric Lefebvre f?cite of ḻ.orientation of this budget and with satisfaction notes the fall of the rate of growth of the public d?nse. L’.effort authorized on manpower of l’.?at is a sign of this volont?Cependant, at the moment o?e Parlement d?t of this budget, l’.Espagne, it, d?t of the best use of its exc?nts. Eleven countries europ?s pr?ntent exc?nts of their public balance. The Prime Minister has thus been right to recall that the Parliament fran?s n’.a not vot?n budget in?ilibre for thirty-three years. this?rd, which l’.?ilibre thinks the Government of the cut off date of 2012 to reach...?ouard Balladur, pr?dent comit?e r?exion and of proposal on the modernization and the r?uilibrage of the institutions of V R?blique, a constitutional private bill aiming?nscrire the principle of this?ilibre budg?anger in the Constitution. It is appropriate?lement of s’.accorder on a strict d?nition of the d?nses d’.investissement, which only can give place?n endettement..Yves Censi?lement f?cite of virtuous l’.attitude that the Government adopts?’.?rd d?cit. Face?es financial stakes consid?bles, it shows?a rigorous time and inform?S’.agissant of the r?sion g?rale public policies, the r?exion can?e?ndue?’.ensemble of tax measurements on the products and services financial. The Parliament has too little d’.informations indeed and cannot take strat?ques d?sions with the necessary pr?sion. The bill TEPA, for example, n’.?it not matched?des d’.impact n?ssaires. In addition, which d?sions the Government hopes it to take about the debt of l’.?at towards the FFIPSA.. Lastly, one misses d’.informations on what?e the cons?ences of the budget of school could l’.enseignement. However l’.on knows that in some ann?, France will not be able any more to produce milk and the bl?ui is to him n?ssaires. However, a certain number of d?nses of the PLF respect the..z? value... Is the r?sion g?rale of the public policies only F? to re-examine l’.ensemble ḻ.affectation of the d?nses. In addition, the budget pr?it 260.millions d’.euros suppl?ntaires for r?ndre?̱.augmentation of the premium for l’.emploi, because of the r?tualisation of l’.ensemble of the bar?s. As for the p?m?e, it is?ndu in the PLF for 2008 with the assignments of receipts to the op?teurs. The follow-up of the d?nses will be more and more pr?s, conform?nt with the vœ.u of Mr. With regard to the obligatory rates of pr?vements, a?sticit?st indeed pr?e. The rate d’.?sticit?onstat?n 2006?nt de.2 and that of 2007 de.1,6, l’.hypoth? of does work seem raisonnable..Fr?ric Lefebvre sugg? d’.inscrire l’.?ilibre in the Constitution. On this subject, it is advisable to let the comit?r?d?ar M..?ouard Balladur go at the end of its r?exion. Is L’.important to remain responsible and reasonable, of mani? ?e not to fall into a exc?de d?nses public which would kill the growth. S’.agissant of the FFIPSA, it will be propos?n rectifying finance law the refunding of 619.millions d’.euros whose l’.?at is indebted with the title of the remainder of the BAPSA. For the remainder, the Government proposes a calendar and a dialogue. It is advisable to respect the particularit?du agricultural world while ensuring a good governorship. The debt and d?cits s’.accroissant each ann? op?r will thus be needed choices. ?ments pr?s on this subject have? transmitted?a commission of contr? s?rit?ociale and with pr?dent of the MSA. In mati? d’.aide public with d?loppement, France keeps to its commitments as much as its financial standing? allows. A new program int?e d’.ailleurs cod?loppement in the PLF. Moreover?a continuation of the proposals of Pr?dent of R?blique?des in the lyc? fran?s?’.?anger?luent towards gratuit?Apr?5.millions in 2007, it is 20.millions d’.euros which will be d?g?en 2008 and l’.effort will be continued in 2009 for?ndre the gratuit?ux seconds, premi?s and final. The question of Natura 2000 owes?e abord?avec MM..Jean-Louis.Borloo and Michel.Barnier. M?, on the probl?s pr?s of the budget of l’.enseignement school, M. Pr?dent Didier Migaud thanks Mrs. the minister for ḻ.?onomy, finances and l’.emploi and M..le Minister for the Budget, the public accounts and the public office, and good courage for the continuation of the d?ts wishes them.